Worse than Mabel and Billy Gunn??? Don't think so.

Regal told the "The Sun" newspaper this week that he'll be 40 in a few weeks and he wanted a chance to wrestle more becuase he still felt like he had enough left in him to take on the big names For a guy who has never main evented much shouldn't he have a chance Wit the credibility someone like Jeff Hardy has shown would you rather have him?
 
Jeff

Wow! Billy Gunn better than Regal??? That is the DUMBEST thing I've ever read during my short time on this board and I think this is one of the better boards on the net. And I know wrestling is all opinion but sometime you just can't defend some opinions. Lets see:
 
Better wrestler: Regal
Better mic skills: Regal
More titles: Regal
More over: Regal. Regal was over during his first run as commissioner in 2001, was over as an unAmerican in 2002, was over as a face tag team with Eugene a few years back, and he is the MOST over heel on Raw NOW. Billy Gunn was over as part of DX and only very briefly as a queer in a tag team that went nowhere after a god-awful angle. And now what is he doing? Oh yeah, the same old wash up act with the guy who got him over anyways in the Bush league TNA. It's not even debatable, ten out of ten wrestlers would rather have Regal's career over Billy Gunn's anyday. Gunn is the worst King of the Ring and perhaps the biggest waste of a push in the past ten years. There is a reason Austin FLAT OUT REFUSED to work a program with Gunn, he couldn't draw a dime with a pencil.

Remember Jamison? He was only an actor but even he would've been a better king than Billy and Mable put together
 
Jeff

He's now suspended for 60 days Regal committed his 2nd offense of the wellness policy *rolls eyes* "Oh Please!" and is out for 60 days he lost a you're fired match to Mr Kennedy to end his Role not only as GM but King  
 
Jeff